District Sentencing

Guidelines Manual, Chapter TwoFY2018–FY2025

Guidelines

§2E1.1

Unlawful conduct relating to racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations · 0.1% of federal cases · Guidelines Manual

The datafile contains cases reported to the Commission with sentencing documents. Sentence length statistics use the Commission's capped variable (sentences of 470 months or longer, including life, are recorded as 470 months) and exclude sentences of probation or a fine only. Figures are aggregates of past cases and are not a prediction for any case.

10cases, FY2025387 over FY2018–FY2025
27median prison monthsall cases 24
41%within guideline rangeall cases 47%
93%cases with a prison termall cases 92%

§ 1Length of prison terms

13%
4%
19%
30%
22%
10%
<10
<10
median 27 mo
under 6 mo6–11 mo1–2 yr2–3 yr3–5 yr5–10 yr10–15 yr15–20 yr20–30 yr30 yr+life
Share of cases with a prison term, by length of the term (359 cases with a prison term; life and terms of 470 months or more counted as life). Grey: all federal cases.

Interquartile range 15–41 months; mean 31. 0 cases at the 470-month cap.

§ 2Summary

§2E1.1 (unlawful conduct relating to racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations) was the primary guideline in 387 cases sentenced across 8 fiscal years (FY2018–FY2025), 0.1% of all cases, with 10 in FY2025. The Commission classes most of them as extortion/racketeering.

The median prison term under §2E1.1 was 27 months (2 yr 3 mo) (all cases nationally: 24 months); 93% of cases carried a prison term.

41% of sentences were within the guideline range. Of the rest, 26% were below the range on a government motion, 26% below it for other reasons and 7% above it. The departure and variance table below uses the Commission's nine SENTRNGE categories.

FY2025 had fewer cases than FY2018 (10 against 142). The median prison term was about the same in FY2025 as in FY2018.

§ 3Departures and variances

Within guideline range 41%Above range 7%Below range, government sponsored 26%Below range, other 26%Not determinable 0

Commission category (SENTRNGE)CasesShareAll cases
Within range16041.3%47.4%
Upward departure<10—0.5%
Above-range variance215.4%2.6%
§5K1.1 substantial assistance5514.2%9.5%
§5K3.1 early disposition<10—9.2%
Government-sponsored departure123.1%1.9%
Government-sponsored variance348.8%8.0%
Downward departure143.6%2.1%
Below-range variance8622.2%18.8%
Missing or indeterminable0——

Shares are of cases with a determinable range status. Departures cite a provision of the Guidelines Manual; variances rest on the statutory sentencing factors (18 U.S.C. §3553(a)) after United States v. Booker.

§ 4Cases by fiscal year

142
62
25
31
48
47
22
10
’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Cases sentenced under §2E1.1 per fiscal year (fiscal years 2018–2025)
28
33
30
24
24
24
24
26
’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Median prison months by fiscal year (fiscal years 2018–2025)
Fiscal yearCasesPrisonMedian monthsWithin rangeBelow, gov.Below, otherAbove
FY2018142—2851%22%21%—
FY201962—3348%27%——
FY202025—30————
FY202131—2442%—39%0%
FY202248—2433%33%29%—
FY202347—2428%28%40%—
FY202422—24—46%——
FY202510100%26———0%

§ 5Offence types the Commission assigns

Primary offence typeCasesShare
Extortion/Racketeering387100.0%

§ 6Districts with the most cases

DistrictCasesPrisonMedian monthsWithin rangeBelow, gov.Below, other
District of Maryland D. Md.110—3048%29%15%
Western District of North Carolina W.D.N.C.54100%3391%——
District of Massachusetts D. Mass.39100%21—33%44%
Central District of California C.D. Cal.33—24—33%39%
Southern District of New York S.D.N.Y.26—24——58%
District of Puerto Rico D.P.R.19—20———
Eastern District of New York E.D.N.Y.13—25———
Southern District of California S.D. Cal.13—36———
Northern District of California N.D. Cal.10—————
Eastern District of Michigan E.D. Mich.<10fewer than 10 cases
Northern District of Ohio N.D. Ohio<10fewer than 10 cases
Northern District of Georgia N.D. Ga.<10fewer than 10 cases
District of South Carolina D.S.C.<10fewer than 10 cases
Northern District of West Virginia N.D.W. Va.<10fewer than 10 cases
Western District of Tennessee W.D. Tenn.<10fewer than 10 cases
Northern District of Illinois N.D. Ill.<10fewer than 10 cases
District of New Mexico D.N.M.<10fewer than 10 cases
Western District of New York W.D.N.Y.<10fewer than 10 cases
District of New Jersey D.N.J.<10fewer than 10 cases
Western District of Louisiana W.D. La.<10fewer than 10 cases

By circuit

CircuitCasesPrisonMedian monthsWithin rangeBelow, gov.Below, other
District of Columbia Circuit0fewer than 10 cases
First Circuit59—2119%32%42%
Second Circuit42—2426%—50%
Third Circuit<10fewer than 10 cases
Fourth Circuit177—3060%21%13%
Fifth Circuit<10fewer than 10 cases
Sixth Circuit24100%2950%——
Seventh Circuit<10fewer than 10 cases
Eighth Circuit<10fewer than 10 cases
Ninth Circuit57—2421%30%40%
Tenth Circuit<10fewer than 10 cases
Eleventh Circuit<10fewer than 10 cases

§ 7Questions and answers

What is §2E1.1?

Section 2E1.1 of the Guidelines Manual: unlawful conduct relating to racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations. On this site a case is counted under a guideline when the Commission records it as the primary guideline (GDLINEHI) applied at sentencing.

What is the typical sentence under §2E1.1?

The median prison term over FY2018–FY2025 was 27 months (2 yr 3 mo), with the middle half between 15 and 41 months.

How often do sentences under §2E1.1 depart or vary from the range?

59% of sentences were outside the guideline range. Substantial-assistance motions under §5K1.1 accounted for 14% and below-range variances for 22%.

Which districts see the most §2E1.1 cases?

the District of Maryland (110), the Western District of North Carolina (54) and the District of Massachusetts (39).

§ 8Provenance

Source: United States Sentencing Commission, Individual Offender Datafiles, fiscal years 2018–2025 (US government works), aggregated by this site; the FY2025 file is dated 29 Apr 2026. Guideline is the Commission's GDLINEHI field (primary guideline applied). Counts below 10 are hidden or pooled. Errors in this site's processing are corrected at the next build; see corrections. Methodology.