District Sentencing

N.D. Ala. · National DefenseFY2018–FY2025

Districts › Northern District of Alabama

National Defense in the Northern District of Alabama

N.D. Ala. · Eleventh Circuit · National Defense nationally

The datafile contains cases reported to the Commission with sentencing documents. Sentence length statistics use the Commission's capped variable (sentences of 470 months or longer, including life, are recorded as 470 months) and exclude sentences of probation or a fine only. Figures are aggregates of past cases and are not a prediction for any case.

49cases, FY2025115 over FY2018–FY2025
—median prison monthsnational, this offence: 24
97%within guideline rangenational 37%
—cases with a prison termnational 84%

§ 1Length of prison terms

Fewer than 10 cases with a prison term: distribution not shown.

Share of cases with a prison term, by length of the term (<10 cases with a prison term; life and terms of 470 months or more counted as life). Grey: national defense offences nationally.

Interquartile range —–— months; mean —. 0 cases at the Commission's 470-month cap (life or longer).

§ 2Summary

115 national defense offences were sentenced in the Northern District of Alabama across 8 fiscal years (FY2018–FY2025), 49 of them in FY2025; that is 3% of the district's caseload.

97% of these sentences were within the guideline range (nationally for this offence type: 37%); — were below the range on a government motion and 0% below it for other reasons.

FY2025 had more cases than FY2021 (49 against 12).

These are aggregates of past cases. The guideline range for any case depends on its offence level, criminal history and statutory minimums, and the sentence on the court's findings; no figure here estimates an outcome.

§ 3Position relative to the guideline range

Within guideline range 97%Above range 0%Below range, government sponsored <10Below range, other 0%Not determinable 0

§ 4Compared with the district, the circuit and the nation

MeasureN.D. Ala., national defenseN.D. Ala., all offences11th Cir., national defenseUS, national defense
Cases per fiscal year1447032241
Share of district caseload3.1%100%——
Median prison months—463624
Mean prison months—70—38
Cases with a prison term—83%50%84%
Within guideline range97%57%61%37%
Above range0%3%—1%
Below range, government sponsored—22%18%26%
Below range, other0%18%21%36%
Median final offence level418—23

§ 5Trend by fiscal year

<10
<10
<10
12
13
13
17
49
’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
National Defense cases sentenced per fiscal year (fiscal years 2018–2025)
<10
<10
<10
—
—
—
—
—
’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Median prison months by fiscal year (fiscal years 2018–2025)
Fiscal yearCasesPrisonMedian monthsWithin rangeBelow, gov.Below, otherAbove
FY2018<10fewer than 10 cases
FY2019<10fewer than 10 cases
FY2020<10fewer than 10 cases
FY2021120%—100%0%0%0%
FY202213——92%—0%0%
FY2023130%—100%0%0%0%
FY2024170%—100%0%0%0%
FY202549——100%0%0%0%

§ 6Criminal history

Category I— · 82%
Category II0% · 5%
Category III0% · 3%
Category IV0% · 1%
Category V0%
Category VI<10

Share of cases at each final criminal history category; grey figure: national defense offences nationally.

§ 7Guidelines applied

Primary guidelines the Commission associates with this offence type, with the district's caseload under each across all offence types.

§ 8Questions and answers

What is the typical sentence for national defense offences in the Northern District of Alabama?

Too few cases with a prison term to show a median.

How often are national defense offences sentenced below the guideline range here?

— of sentences were below the range on a government motion and 0% below it for other reasons; 97% were within the range. The Commission's categories are explained in the guide to how the guidelines work.

How does this compare with the rest of the country?

Nationally, national defense offences had a median prison term of 24 months and a within-range share of 37% over the same period. The district's figures are null on median term and higher than the national within-range share.

Which guidelines are involved?

The most common primary guidelines for these cases are §none, §2X1.1 and §2M5.3.

Is this a prediction for a particular case?

No. The figures are aggregates of sentences already imposed, as recorded by the US Sentencing Commission. They are not legal advice and do not estimate the outcome of any case.

§ 9Other offence types in the Northern District of Alabama

§ 10Provenance

Source: United States Sentencing Commission, Individual Offender Datafiles, fiscal years 2018–2025 (US government works), aggregated by this site; the FY2025 file is dated 29 Apr 2026. Offence type is the Commission's OFFGUIDE code 23; district is CIRCDIST 87. Counts below 10 are hidden or pooled. Errors in this site's processing are corrected at the next build; see corrections. Methodology.