District Sentencing

N.D. Ala. · Drug PossessionFY2018–FY2025

Districts › Northern District of Alabama

Drug Possession in the Northern District of Alabama

N.D. Ala. · Eleventh Circuit · Drug Possession nationally

The datafile contains cases reported to the Commission with sentencing documents. Sentence length statistics use the Commission's capped variable (sentences of 470 months or longer, including life, are recorded as 470 months) and exclude sentences of probation or a fine only. Figures are aggregates of past cases and are not a prediction for any case.

<10cases, FY202539 over FY2018–FY2025
—median prison monthsnational, this offence: 4
95%within guideline rangenational 90%
—cases with a prison termnational 53%

§ 1Length of prison terms

Fewer than 10 cases with a prison term: distribution not shown.

Share of cases with a prison term, by length of the term (<10 cases with a prison term; life and terms of 470 months or more counted as life). Grey: drug possession offences nationally.

Interquartile range —–— months; mean —. 0 cases at the Commission's 470-month cap (life or longer).

§ 2Summary

39 drug possession offences were sentenced in the Northern District of Alabama across 8 fiscal years (FY2018–FY2025), <10 of them in FY2025; that is 1% of the district's caseload.

95% of these sentences were within the guideline range (nationally for this offence type: 90%); 0% were below the range on a government motion and — below it for other reasons.

These are aggregates of past cases. The guideline range for any case depends on its offence level, criminal history and statutory minimums, and the sentence on the court's findings; no figure here estimates an outcome.

§ 3Position relative to the guideline range

Within guideline range 95%Above range <10Below range, government sponsored 0%Below range, other <10Not determinable <10

§ 4Compared with the district, the circuit and the nation

MeasureN.D. Ala., drug possessionN.D. Ala., all offences11th Cir., drug possessionUS, drug possession
Cases per fiscal year<1047021342
Share of district caseload1.0%100%——
Median prison months—4634
Mean prison months—70—4
Cases with a prison term—83%32%53%
Within guideline range95%57%90%90%
Above range—3%—6%
Below range, government sponsored0%22%—3%
Below range, other—18%—3%
Median final offence level418—2

§ 5Trend by fiscal year

<10
<10
<10
<10
15
<10
<10
<10
’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Drug Possession cases sentenced per fiscal year (fiscal years 2018–2025)
<10
<10
<10
<10
—
<10
<10
<10
’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Median prison months by fiscal year (fiscal years 2018–2025)
Fiscal yearCasesPrisonMedian monthsWithin rangeBelow, gov.Below, otherAbove
FY2018<10fewer than 10 cases
FY2019<10fewer than 10 cases
FY20200fewer than 10 cases
FY2021<10fewer than 10 cases
FY2022150%—100%0%0%0%
FY2023<10fewer than 10 cases
FY2024<10fewer than 10 cases
FY2025<10fewer than 10 cases

§ 6Criminal history

Category I— · 71%
Category II<10
Category III<10
Category IV<10
Category V0% · 3%
Category VI<10

Share of cases at each final criminal history category; grey figure: drug possession offences nationally.

§ 7Guidelines applied

Primary guidelines the Commission associates with this offence type, with the district's caseload under each across all offence types.

§ 8Questions and answers

What is the typical sentence for drug possession offences in the Northern District of Alabama?

Too few cases with a prison term to show a median.

How often are drug possession offences sentenced below the guideline range here?

0% of sentences were below the range on a government motion and — below it for other reasons; 95% were within the range. The Commission's categories are explained in the guide to how the guidelines work.

How does this compare with the rest of the country?

Nationally, drug possession offences had a median prison term of 4 months and a within-range share of 90% over the same period. The district's figures are null on median term and higher than the national within-range share.

Which guidelines are involved?

The most common primary guidelines for these cases are §none and §2D2.1.

Is this a prediction for a particular case?

No. The figures are aggregates of sentences already imposed, as recorded by the US Sentencing Commission. They are not legal advice and do not estimate the outcome of any case.

§ 9Other offence types in the Northern District of Alabama

§ 10Provenance

Source: United States Sentencing Commission, Individual Offender Datafiles, fiscal years 2018–2025 (US government works), aggregated by this site; the FY2025 file is dated 29 Apr 2026. Offence type is the Commission's OFFGUIDE code 9; district is CIRCDIST 87. Counts below 10 are hidden or pooled. Errors in this site's processing are corrected at the next build; see corrections. Methodology.