District Sentencing

D. Mass. · ImmigrationFY2018–FY2025

Districts › District of Massachusetts

Immigration in the District of Massachusetts

D. Mass. · First Circuit · Immigration nationally

The datafile contains cases reported to the Commission with sentencing documents. Sentence length statistics use the Commission's capped variable (sentences of 470 months or longer, including life, are recorded as 470 months) and exclude sentences of probation or a fine only. Figures are aggregates of past cases and are not a prediction for any case.

91cases, FY2025364 over FY2018–FY2025
7median prison monthsnational, this offence: 6
52%within guideline rangenational 62%
96%cases with a prison termnational 95%

§ 1Length of prison terms

41%
21%
23%
8%
5%
<10
<10
median 7 mo
under 6 mo6–11 mo1–2 yr2–3 yr3–5 yr5–10 yr10–15 yr15–20 yr20–30 yr30 yr+life
Share of cases with a prison term, by length of the term (350 cases with a prison term; life and terms of 470 months or more counted as life). Grey: immigration offences nationally.

Interquartile range 1–15 months; mean 12. 0 cases at the Commission's 470-month cap (life or longer).

§ 2Summary

Immigration was the primary offence type in 364 cases sentenced in the District of Massachusetts between FY2018 and FY2025 (9% of the district's cases), with 91 in FY2025.

The median prison term was 7 months, longer than the national median for immigration offences (6 months) and longer than the First Circuit median (6). Half of prison terms fell between 1 and 15 months; 96% of cases carried a prison term.

52% of these sentences were within the guideline range (nationally for this offence type: 62%); 18% were below the range on a government motion and 28% below it for other reasons.

FY2025 had more cases than FY2018 (91 against 74). The median prison term in FY2025 (5 months) was shorter than in FY2018 (6 months).

These are aggregates of past cases. The guideline range for any case depends on its offence level, criminal history and statutory minimums, and the sentence on the court's findings; no figure here estimates an outcome.

§ 3Position relative to the guideline range

Within guideline range 52%Above range <10Below range, government sponsored 18%Below range, other 28%Not determinable <10

§ 4Compared with the district, the circuit and the nation

MeasureD. Mass., immigrationD. Mass., all offences1st Cir., immigrationUS, immigration
Cases per fiscal year4648118122,153
Share of district caseload9.5%100%——
Median prison months73066
Mean prison months1250—11
Cases with a prison term96%93%90%95%
Within guideline range52%29%67%62%
Above range—3%2%3%
Below range, government sponsored18%33%12%25%
Below range, other28%36%20%11%
Median final offence level1021—10

§ 5Trend by fiscal year

74
65
30
28
16
28
32
91
’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Immigration cases sentenced per fiscal year (fiscal years 2018–2025)
6
9
7
10
12
12
12
5
’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Median prison months by fiscal year (fiscal years 2018–2025)
Fiscal yearCasesPrisonMedian monthsWithin rangeBelow, gov.Below, otherAbove
FY201874—656%21%22%—
FY201965—963%—32%—
FY202030100%762%———
FY202128—1059%———
FY202216—12——75%0%
FY202328—1239%—36%0%
FY202432—1231%—38%—
FY202591—554%26%17%—

§ 6Criminal history

Category I41% · 44%
Category II24% · 22%
Category III18% · 19%
Category IV11% · 8%
Category V5% · 4%
Category VI<10

Share of cases at each final criminal history category; grey figure: immigration offences nationally.

§ 7Guidelines applied

Primary guidelines the Commission associates with this offence type, with the district's caseload under each across all offence types.

§ 8Questions and answers

What is the typical sentence for immigration offences in the District of Massachusetts?

The median prison term over FY2018–FY2025 was 7 months, with the middle half of terms between 1 and 15 months. 96% of cases carried a prison term. The national median for immigration offences is 6 months.

How often are immigration offences sentenced below the guideline range here?

18% of sentences were below the range on a government motion and 28% below it for other reasons; 52% were within the range. The Commission's categories are explained in the guide to how the guidelines work.

How does this compare with the rest of the country?

Nationally, immigration offences had a median prison term of 6 months and a within-range share of 62% over the same period. The district's figures are above on median term and lower than the national within-range share.

Which guidelines are involved?

The most common primary guidelines for these cases are §2L1.2, §none and §2L2.2.

Is this a prediction for a particular case?

No. The figures are aggregates of sentences already imposed, as recorded by the US Sentencing Commission. They are not legal advice and do not estimate the outcome of any case.

§ 9Other offence types in the District of Massachusetts

§ 10Provenance

Source: United States Sentencing Commission, Individual Offender Datafiles, fiscal years 2018–2025 (US government works), aggregated by this site; the FY2025 file is dated 29 Apr 2026. Offence type is the Commission's OFFGUIDE code 17; district is CIRCDIST 03. Counts below 10 are hidden or pooled. Errors in this site's processing are corrected at the next build; see corrections. Methodology.