District Sentencing

E.D. Mich. · ImmigrationFY2018–FY2025

Districts › Eastern District of Michigan

Immigration in the Eastern District of Michigan

E.D. Mich. · Sixth Circuit · Immigration nationally

The datafile contains cases reported to the Commission with sentencing documents. Sentence length statistics use the Commission's capped variable (sentences of 470 months or longer, including life, are recorded as 470 months) and exclude sentences of probation or a fine only. Figures are aggregates of past cases and are not a prediction for any case.

211cases, FY2025867 over FY2018–FY2025
3median prison monthsnational, this offence: 6
80%within guideline rangenational 62%
99%cases with a prison termnational 95%

§ 1Length of prison terms

72%
17%
7%
2%
<10
<10
median 3 mo
under 6 mo6–11 mo1–2 yr2–3 yr3–5 yr5–10 yr10–15 yr15–20 yr20–30 yr30 yr+life
Share of cases with a prison term, by length of the term (855 cases with a prison term; life and terms of 470 months or more counted as life). Grey: immigration offences nationally.

Interquartile range 2–6 months; mean 5. 0 cases at the Commission's 470-month cap (life or longer).

§ 2Summary

867 immigration offences were sentenced in the Eastern District of Michigan across 8 fiscal years (FY2018–FY2025), 211 of them in FY2025; that is 15% of the district's caseload.

The median prison term was 3 months, shorter than the national median for immigration offences (6 months) and shorter than the Sixth Circuit median (5). Half of prison terms fell between 2 and 6 months; 99% of cases carried a prison term.

80% of these sentences were within the guideline range (nationally for this offence type: 62%); 2% were below the range on a government motion and 19% below it for other reasons.

Caseload in FY2025 was about the same as in FY2018. The median prison term in FY2025 (3 months) was shorter than in FY2018 (4 months).

These are aggregates of past cases. The guideline range for any case depends on its offence level, criminal history and statutory minimums, and the sentence on the court's findings; no figure here estimates an outcome.

§ 3Position relative to the guideline range

Within guideline range 80%Above range <10Below range, government sponsored 2%Below range, other 19%Not determinable <10

§ 4Compared with the district, the circuit and the nation

MeasureE.D. Mich., immigrationE.D. Mich., all offences6th Cir., immigrationUS, immigration
Cases per fiscal year10871836322,153
Share of district caseload15.1%100%——
Median prison months33656
Mean prison months560—11
Cases with a prison term99%94%98%95%
Within guideline range80%38%78%62%
Above range—1%2%3%
Below range, government sponsored2%17%7%25%
Below range, other19%44%14%11%
Median final offence level619—10

§ 5Trend by fiscal year

193
156
127
55
24
46
55
211
’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Immigration cases sentenced per fiscal year (fiscal years 2018–2025)
4
3
3
3
10
5
6
3
’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Median prison months by fiscal year (fiscal years 2018–2025)
Fiscal yearCasesPrisonMedian monthsWithin rangeBelow, gov.Below, otherAbove
FY2018193—485%—13%—
FY2019156100%381%—17%—
FY2020127100%377%—21%0%
FY202155100%373%—26%0%
FY202224—1065%——0%
FY202346—574%0%26%0%
FY202455—669%—27%0%
FY2025211—383%—17%0%

§ 6Criminal history

Category I62% · 44%
Category II23% · 22%
Category III12% · 19%
Category IV2% · 8%
Category V<10
Category VI<10

Share of cases at each final criminal history category; grey figure: immigration offences nationally.

§ 7Guidelines applied

Primary guidelines the Commission associates with this offence type, with the district's caseload under each across all offence types.

§ 8Questions and answers

What is the typical sentence for immigration offences in the Eastern District of Michigan?

The median prison term over FY2018–FY2025 was 3 months, with the middle half of terms between 2 and 6 months. 99% of cases carried a prison term. The national median for immigration offences is 6 months.

How often are immigration offences sentenced below the guideline range here?

2% of sentences were below the range on a government motion and 19% below it for other reasons; 80% were within the range. The Commission's categories are explained in the guide to how the guidelines work.

How does this compare with the rest of the country?

Nationally, immigration offences had a median prison term of 6 months and a within-range share of 62% over the same period. The district's figures are below on median term and higher than the national within-range share.

Which guidelines are involved?

The most common primary guidelines for these cases are §2L1.2, §none and §2L2.2.

Is this a prediction for a particular case?

No. The figures are aggregates of sentences already imposed, as recorded by the US Sentencing Commission. They are not legal advice and do not estimate the outcome of any case.

§ 9Other offence types in the Eastern District of Michigan

§ 10Provenance

Source: United States Sentencing Commission, Individual Offender Datafiles, fiscal years 2018–2025 (US government works), aggregated by this site; the FY2025 file is dated 29 Apr 2026. Offence type is the Commission's OFFGUIDE code 17; district is CIRCDIST 39. Counts below 10 are hidden or pooled. Errors in this site's processing are corrected at the next build; see corrections. Methodology.