District Sentencing

N.D. Tex. · Fraud/Theft/EmbezzlementFY2018–FY2025

Districts › Northern District of Texas

Fraud/Theft/Embezzlement in the Northern District of Texas

N.D. Tex. · Fifth Circuit · Fraud/Theft/Embezzlement nationally

The datafile contains cases reported to the Commission with sentencing documents. Sentence length statistics use the Commission's capped variable (sentences of 470 months or longer, including life, are recorded as 470 months) and exclude sentences of probation or a fine only. Figures are aggregates of past cases and are not a prediction for any case.

110cases, FY20251,063 over FY2018–FY2025
30median prison monthsnational, this offence: 20
56%within guideline rangenational 44%
82%cases with a prison termnational 74%

§ 1Length of prison terms

6%
9%
20%
20%
22%
18%
4%
<10
<10
<10
median 30 mo
under 6 mo6–11 mo1–2 yr2–3 yr3–5 yr5–10 yr10–15 yr15–20 yr20–30 yr30 yr+life
Share of cases with a prison term, by length of the term (869 cases with a prison term; life and terms of 470 months or more counted as life). Grey: fraud, theft and embezzlement offences nationally.

Interquartile range 15–54 months; mean 41. 0 cases at the Commission's 470-month cap (life or longer).

§ 2Summary

1,063 fraud, theft and embezzlement offences were sentenced in the Northern District of Texas across 8 fiscal years (FY2018–FY2025), 110 of them in FY2025; that is 9% of the district's caseload.

The median prison term was 30 months (2 yr 6 mo), longer than the national median for fraud, theft and embezzlement offences (20 months) and longer than the Fifth Circuit median (18). Half of prison terms fell between 15 and 54 months; 82% of cases carried a prison term.

56% of these sentences were within the guideline range (nationally for this offence type: 44%); 19% were below the range on a government motion and 18% below it for other reasons.

Caseload in FY2025 was about the same as in FY2018. The median prison term in FY2025 (30 months) was shorter than in FY2018 (36 months).

These are aggregates of past cases. The guideline range for any case depends on its offence level, criminal history and statutory minimums, and the sentence on the court's findings; no figure here estimates an outcome.

§ 3Position relative to the guideline range

Within guideline range 56%Above range 7%Below range, government sponsored 19%Below range, other 18%Not determinable 0

§ 4Compared with the district, the circuit and the nation

MeasureN.D. Tex., fraud/theft/embezzlementN.D. Tex., all offences5th Cir., fraud/theft/embezzlementUS, fraud/theft/embezzlement
Cases per fiscal year1331,4737365,440
Share of district caseload9.0%100%——
Median prison months30601820
Mean prison months4191—28
Cases with a prison term82%96%75%74%
Within guideline range56%62%59%44%
Above range7%7%5%3%
Below range, government sponsored19%14%18%25%
Below range, other18%17%18%29%
Median final offence level1623—14

§ 5Trend by fiscal year

124
145
117
166
136
151
114
110
’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Fraud/Theft/Embezzlement cases sentenced per fiscal year (fiscal years 2018–2025)
36
36
33
27
30
30
28
30
’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Median prison months by fiscal year (fiscal years 2018–2025)
Fiscal yearCasesPrisonMedian monthsWithin rangeBelow, gov.Below, otherAbove
FY201812481%3658%20%15%—
FY201914577%3657%17%19%7%
FY202011771%3361%10%18%11%
FY202116682%2754%25%13%7%
FY202213688%3047%21%21%11%
FY202315182%3056%18%23%—
FY202411490%2853%28%16%—
FY202511084%3067%11%17%—

§ 6Criminal history

Category I62% · 71%
Category II10% · 9%
Category III9% · 8%
Category IV6% · 4%
Category V5% · 3%
Category VI9% · 5%

Share of cases at each final criminal history category; grey figure: fraud, theft and embezzlement offences nationally.

§ 7Guidelines applied

Primary guidelines the Commission associates with this offence type, with the district's caseload under each across all offence types.

§ 8Questions and answers

What is the typical sentence for fraud, theft and embezzlement offences in the Northern District of Texas?

The median prison term over FY2018–FY2025 was 30 months (2 yr 6 mo), with the middle half of terms between 15 and 54 months. 82% of cases carried a prison term. The national median for fraud, theft and embezzlement offences is 20 months.

How often are fraud, theft and embezzlement offences sentenced below the guideline range here?

19% of sentences were below the range on a government motion and 18% below it for other reasons; 56% were within the range. The Commission's categories are explained in the guide to how the guidelines work.

How does this compare with the rest of the country?

Nationally, fraud, theft and embezzlement offences had a median prison term of 20 months and a within-range share of 44% over the same period. The district's figures are above on median term and higher than the national within-range share.

Which guidelines are involved?

The most common primary guidelines for these cases are §2B1.1, §none and §2X3.1.

Is this a prediction for a particular case?

No. The figures are aggregates of sentences already imposed, as recorded by the US Sentencing Commission. They are not legal advice and do not estimate the outcome of any case.

§ 9Other offence types in the Northern District of Texas

§ 10Provenance

Source: United States Sentencing Commission, Individual Offender Datafiles, fiscal years 2018–2025 (US government works), aggregated by this site; the FY2025 file is dated 29 Apr 2026. Offence type is the Commission's OFFGUIDE code 16; district is CIRCDIST 34. Counts below 10 are hidden or pooled. Errors in this site's processing are corrected at the next build; see corrections. Methodology.