District Sentencing

M.D. La. · Fraud/Theft/EmbezzlementFY2018–FY2025

Districts › Middle District of Louisiana

Fraud/Theft/Embezzlement in the Middle District of Louisiana

M.D. La. · Fifth Circuit · Fraud/Theft/Embezzlement nationally

The datafile contains cases reported to the Commission with sentencing documents. Sentence length statistics use the Commission's capped variable (sentences of 470 months or longer, including life, are recorded as 470 months) and exclude sentences of probation or a fine only. Figures are aggregates of past cases and are not a prediction for any case.

10cases, FY2025179 over FY2018–FY2025
22median prison monthsnational, this offence: 20
41%within guideline rangenational 44%
71%cases with a prison termnational 74%

§ 1Length of prison terms

13%
15%
22%
19%
11%
13%
<10
median 22 mo
under 6 mo6–11 mo1–2 yr2–3 yr3–5 yr5–10 yr10–15 yr15–20 yr20–30 yr30 yr+life
Share of cases with a prison term, by length of the term (127 cases with a prison term; life and terms of 470 months or more counted as life). Grey: fraud, theft and embezzlement offences nationally.

Interquartile range 10–46 months; mean 36. 0 cases at the Commission's 470-month cap (life or longer).

§ 2Summary

Fraud/Theft/Embezzlement was the primary offence type in 179 cases sentenced in the Middle District of Louisiana between FY2018 and FY2025 (19% of the district's cases), with 10 in FY2025.

The median prison term was 22 months (1 yr 10 mo), close to the national median for fraud, theft and embezzlement offences (20 months) and longer than the Fifth Circuit median (18). Half of prison terms fell between 10 and 46 months; 71% of cases carried a prison term.

41% of these sentences were within the guideline range (nationally for this offence type: 44%); 23% were below the range on a government motion and 37% below it for other reasons.

FY2025 had fewer cases than FY2018 (10 against 35). The median prison term in FY2025 (30 months) was longer than in FY2018 (13 months).

These are aggregates of past cases. The guideline range for any case depends on its offence level, criminal history and statutory minimums, and the sentence on the court's findings; no figure here estimates an outcome.

§ 3Position relative to the guideline range

Within guideline range 41%Above range 0%Below range, government sponsored 23%Below range, other 37%Not determinable <10

§ 4Compared with the district, the circuit and the nation

MeasureM.D. La., fraud/theft/embezzlementM.D. La., all offences5th Cir., fraud/theft/embezzlementUS, fraud/theft/embezzlement
Cases per fiscal year221197365,440
Share of district caseload18.7%100%——
Median prison months22371820
Mean prison months3658—28
Cases with a prison term71%89%75%74%
Within guideline range41%54%59%44%
Above range0%2%5%3%
Below range, government sponsored23%20%18%25%
Below range, other37%24%18%29%
Median final offence level1519—14

§ 5Trend by fiscal year

35
30
27
25
22
19
11
10
’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Fraud/Theft/Embezzlement cases sentenced per fiscal year (fiscal years 2018–2025)
13
22
13
21
24
44
—
30
’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Median prison months by fiscal year (fiscal years 2018–2025)
Fiscal yearCasesPrisonMedian monthsWithin rangeBelow, gov.Below, otherAbove
FY20183563%1346%—34%0%
FY201930—2240%33%—0%
FY202027—1362%0%39%0%
FY202125—2140%——0%
FY202222—24——46%0%
FY202319—44———0%
FY202411—————0%
FY202510100%30———0%

§ 6Criminal history

Category I73% · 71%
Category II6% · 9%
Category III10% · 8%
Category IV<10
Category V<10
Category VI<10

Share of cases at each final criminal history category; grey figure: fraud, theft and embezzlement offences nationally.

§ 7Guidelines applied

Primary guidelines the Commission associates with this offence type, with the district's caseload under each across all offence types.

§ 8Questions and answers

What is the typical sentence for fraud, theft and embezzlement offences in the Middle District of Louisiana?

The median prison term over FY2018–FY2025 was 22 months (1 yr 10 mo), with the middle half of terms between 10 and 46 months. 71% of cases carried a prison term. The national median for fraud, theft and embezzlement offences is 20 months.

How often are fraud, theft and embezzlement offences sentenced below the guideline range here?

23% of sentences were below the range on a government motion and 37% below it for other reasons; 41% were within the range. The Commission's categories are explained in the guide to how the guidelines work.

How does this compare with the rest of the country?

Nationally, fraud, theft and embezzlement offences had a median prison term of 20 months and a within-range share of 44% over the same period. The district's figures are close to on median term and close to the national within-range share.

Which guidelines are involved?

The most common primary guidelines for these cases are §2B1.1, §none and §2B1.4.

Is this a prediction for a particular case?

No. The figures are aggregates of sentences already imposed, as recorded by the US Sentencing Commission. They are not legal advice and do not estimate the outcome of any case.

§ 9Other offence types in the Middle District of Louisiana

§ 10Provenance

Source: United States Sentencing Commission, Individual Offender Datafiles, fiscal years 2018–2025 (US government works), aggregated by this site; the FY2025 file is dated 29 Apr 2026. Offence type is the Commission's OFFGUIDE code 16; district is CIRCDIST 29. Counts below 10 are hidden or pooled. Errors in this site's processing are corrected at the next build; see corrections. Methodology.