District Sentencing

D. Minn. · ImmigrationFY2018–FY2025

Districts › District of Minnesota

Immigration in the District of Minnesota

D. Minn. · Eighth Circuit · Immigration nationally

The datafile contains cases reported to the Commission with sentencing documents. Sentence length statistics use the Commission's capped variable (sentences of 470 months or longer, including life, are recorded as 470 months) and exclude sentences of probation or a fine only. Figures are aggregates of past cases and are not a prediction for any case.

45cases, FY2025113 over FY2018–FY2025
8median prison monthsnational, this offence: 6
60%within guideline rangenational 62%
—cases with a prison termnational 95%

§ 1Length of prison terms

40%
19%
25%
10%
<10
<10
<10
median 8 mo
under 6 mo6–11 mo1–2 yr2–3 yr3–5 yr5–10 yr10–15 yr15–20 yr20–30 yr30 yr+life
Share of cases with a prison term, by length of the term (110 cases with a prison term; life and terms of 470 months or more counted as life). Grey: immigration offences nationally.

Interquartile range 0–18 months; mean 12. 0 cases at the Commission's 470-month cap (life or longer).

§ 2Summary

Immigration was the primary offence type in 113 cases sentenced in the District of Minnesota between FY2018 and FY2025 (4% of the district's cases), with 45 in FY2025.

The median prison term was 8 months, longer than the national median for immigration offences (6 months) and longer than the Eighth Circuit median (5). Half of prison terms fell between 0 and 18 months; — of cases carried a prison term.

60% of these sentences were within the guideline range (nationally for this offence type: 62%); 25% were below the range on a government motion and 14% below it for other reasons.

FY2025 had more cases than FY2018 (45 against 14). The median prison term in FY2025 (0 months) was shorter than in FY2018 (18 months).

These are aggregates of past cases. The guideline range for any case depends on its offence level, criminal history and statutory minimums, and the sentence on the court's findings; no figure here estimates an outcome.

§ 3Position relative to the guideline range

Within guideline range 60%Above range <10Below range, government sponsored 25%Below range, other 14%Not determinable 0

§ 4Compared with the district, the circuit and the nation

MeasureD. Minn., immigrationD. Minn., all offences8th Cir., immigrationUS, immigration
Cases per fiscal year1434029722,153
Share of district caseload4.1%100%——
Median prison months87056
Mean prison months1288—11
Cases with a prison term—92%98%95%
Within guideline range60%30%73%62%
Above range—3%2%3%
Below range, government sponsored25%29%15%25%
Below range, other14%38%10%11%
Median final offence level1025—10

§ 5Trend by fiscal year

14
15
17
<10
<10
<10
<10
45
’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Immigration cases sentenced per fiscal year (fiscal years 2018–2025)
18
17
10
<10
<10
<10
<10
0
’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Median prison months by fiscal year (fiscal years 2018–2025)
Fiscal yearCasesPrisonMedian monthsWithin rangeBelow, gov.Below, otherAbove
FY201814100%18—0%—0%
FY201915—17————
FY202017100%10——0%0%
FY2021<10fewer than 10 cases
FY2022<10fewer than 10 cases
FY2023<10fewer than 10 cases
FY2024<10fewer than 10 cases
FY202545100%073%——0%

§ 6Criminal history

Category I34% · 44%
Category II20% · 22%
Category III27% · 19%
Category IV11% · 8%
Category V<10
Category VI<10

Share of cases at each final criminal history category; grey figure: immigration offences nationally.

§ 7Guidelines applied

Primary guidelines the Commission associates with this offence type, with the district's caseload under each across all offence types.

§ 8Questions and answers

What is the typical sentence for immigration offences in the District of Minnesota?

The median prison term over FY2018–FY2025 was 8 months, with the middle half of terms between 0 and 18 months. — of cases carried a prison term. The national median for immigration offences is 6 months.

How often are immigration offences sentenced below the guideline range here?

25% of sentences were below the range on a government motion and 14% below it for other reasons; 60% were within the range. The Commission's categories are explained in the guide to how the guidelines work.

How does this compare with the rest of the country?

Nationally, immigration offences had a median prison term of 6 months and a within-range share of 62% over the same period. The district's figures are above on median term and close to the national within-range share.

Which guidelines are involved?

The most common primary guidelines for these cases are §2L1.2, §none and §2L2.2.

Is this a prediction for a particular case?

No. The figures are aggregates of sentences already imposed, as recorded by the US Sentencing Commission. They are not legal advice and do not estimate the outcome of any case.

§ 9Other offence types in the District of Minnesota

§ 10Provenance

Source: United States Sentencing Commission, Individual Offender Datafiles, fiscal years 2018–2025 (US government works), aggregated by this site; the FY2025 file is dated 29 Apr 2026. Offence type is the Commission's OFFGUIDE code 17; district is CIRCDIST 57. Counts below 10 are hidden or pooled. Errors in this site's processing are corrected at the next build; see corrections. Methodology.