District Sentencing

D. Kan. · Money LaunderFY2018–FY2025

Districts › District of Kansas

Money Launder in the District of Kansas

D. Kan. · Tenth Circuit · Money Launder nationally

The datafile contains cases reported to the Commission with sentencing documents. Sentence length statistics use the Commission's capped variable (sentences of 470 months or longer, including life, are recorded as 470 months) and exclude sentences of probation or a fine only. Figures are aggregates of past cases and are not a prediction for any case.

<10cases, FY202546 over FY2018–FY2025
20median prison monthsnational, this offence: 40
—within guideline rangenational 25%
57%cases with a prison termnational 88%

§ 1Length of prison terms

<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
median 20 mo
under 6 mo6–11 mo1–2 yr2–3 yr3–5 yr5–10 yr10–15 yr15–20 yr20–30 yr30 yr+life
Share of cases with a prison term, by length of the term (26 cases with a prison term; life and terms of 470 months or more counted as life). Grey: money laundering offences nationally.

Interquartile range 0–60 months; mean 49. 0 cases at the Commission's 470-month cap (life or longer).

§ 2Summary

46 money laundering offences were sentenced in the District of Kansas across 8 fiscal years (FY2018–FY2025), <10 of them in FY2025; that is 1% of the district's caseload.

The median prison term was 20 months (1 yr 8 mo), shorter than the national median for money laundering offences (40 months) and shorter than the Tenth Circuit median (46). Half of prison terms fell between 0 and 60 months; 57% of cases carried a prison term.

These are aggregates of past cases. The guideline range for any case depends on its offence level, criminal history and statutory minimums, and the sentence on the court's findings; no figure here estimates an outcome.

§ 3Position relative to the guideline range

Within guideline range <10Above range 0%Below range, government sponsored 52%Below range, other 28%Not determinable 0

§ 4Compared with the district, the circuit and the nation

MeasureD. Kan., money launderD. Kan., all offences10th Cir., money launderUS, money launder
Cases per fiscal year<10393641,193
Share of district caseload1.5%100%——
Median prison months20464640
Mean prison months4966—67
Cases with a prison term57%85%85%88%
Within guideline range—43%17%25%
Above range0%5%—2%
Below range, government sponsored52%38%59%44%
Below range, other28%14%23%29%
Median final offence level1419—24

§ 5Trend by fiscal year

<10
<10
<10
10
<10
<10
<10
<10
’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Money Launder cases sentenced per fiscal year (fiscal years 2018–2025)
<10
<10
<10
—
<10
<10
<10
<10
’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Median prison months by fiscal year (fiscal years 2018–2025)
Fiscal yearCasesPrisonMedian monthsWithin rangeBelow, gov.Below, otherAbove
FY2018<10fewer than 10 cases
FY2019<10fewer than 10 cases
FY2020<10fewer than 10 cases
FY202110—————0%
FY2022<10fewer than 10 cases
FY2023<10fewer than 10 cases
FY2024<10fewer than 10 cases
FY2025<10fewer than 10 cases

§ 6Criminal history

Category I72% · 73%
Category II24% · 10%
Category III<10
Category IV<10
Category V0% · 2%
Category VI0% · 3%

Share of cases at each final criminal history category; grey figure: money laundering offences nationally.

§ 7Guidelines applied

Primary guidelines the Commission associates with this offence type, with the district's caseload under each across all offence types.

§ 8Questions and answers

What is the typical sentence for money laundering offences in the District of Kansas?

The median prison term over FY2018–FY2025 was 20 months (1 yr 8 mo), with the middle half of terms between 0 and 60 months. 57% of cases carried a prison term. The national median for money laundering offences is 40 months.

How often are money laundering offences sentenced below the guideline range here?

Not enough cases to show.

How does this compare with the rest of the country?

Nationally, money laundering offences had a median prison term of 40 months and a within-range share of 25% over the same period. The district's figures are below on median term and null the national within-range share.

Which guidelines are involved?

The most common primary guidelines for these cases are §none, §2S1.1 and §2X3.1.

Is this a prediction for a particular case?

No. The figures are aggregates of sentences already imposed, as recorded by the US Sentencing Commission. They are not legal advice and do not estimate the outcome of any case.

§ 9Other offence types in the District of Kansas

§ 10Provenance

Source: United States Sentencing Commission, Individual Offender Datafiles, fiscal years 2018–2025 (US government works), aggregated by this site; the FY2025 file is dated 29 Apr 2026. Offence type is the Commission's OFFGUIDE code 21; district is CIRCDIST 79. Counts below 10 are hidden or pooled. Errors in this site's processing are corrected at the next build; see corrections. Methodology.