C.D. Cal. · Fraud/Theft/EmbezzlementFY2018–FY2025
Districts › Central District of California
Fraud/Theft/Embezzlement in the Central District of California
C.D. Cal. · Ninth Circuit · Fraud/Theft/Embezzlement nationally
The datafile contains cases reported to the Commission with sentencing documents. Sentence length statistics use the Commission's capped variable (sentences of 470 months or longer, including life, are recorded as 470 months) and exclude sentences of probation or a fine only. Figures are aggregates of past cases and are not a prediction for any case.
§ 1Length of prison terms
Interquartile range 9–41 months; mean 31. 0 cases at the Commission's 470-month cap (life or longer).
§ 2Summary
1,917 fraud, theft and embezzlement offences were sentenced in the Central District of California across 8 fiscal years (FY2018–FY2025), 181 of them in FY2025; that is 24% of the district's caseload.
The median prison term was 24 months (2 years), longer than the national median for fraud, theft and embezzlement offences (20 months) and longer than the Ninth Circuit median (15). Half of prison terms fell between 9 and 41 months; 80% of cases carried a prison term.
35% of these sentences were within the guideline range (nationally for this offence type: 44%); 29% were below the range on a government motion and 34% below it for other reasons.
FY2025 had fewer cases than FY2018 (181 against 308). The median prison term was about the same in FY2025 as in FY2018.
These are aggregates of past cases. The guideline range for any case depends on its offence level, criminal history and statutory minimums, and the sentence on the court's findings; no figure here estimates an outcome.
§ 3Position relative to the guideline range
Within guideline range 35%Above range 2%Below range, government sponsored 29%Below range, other 34%Not determinable 17
§ 4Compared with the district, the circuit and the nation
| Measure | C.D. Cal., fraud/theft/embezzlement | C.D. Cal., all offences | 9th Cir., fraud/theft/embezzlement | US, fraud/theft/embezzlement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases per fiscal year | 240 | 997 | 875 | 5,440 |
| Share of district caseload | 24.0% | 100% | — | — |
| Median prison months | 24 | 37 | 15 | 20 |
| Mean prison months | 31 | 57 | — | 28 |
| Cases with a prison term | 80% | 86% | 75% | 74% |
| Within guideline range | 35% | 29% | 44% | 44% |
| Above range | 2% | 2% | 3% | 3% |
| Below range, government sponsored | 29% | 34% | 31% | 25% |
| Below range, other | 34% | 36% | 22% | 29% |
| Median final offence level | 15 | 21 | — | 14 |
§ 5Trend by fiscal year
| Fiscal year | Cases | Prison | Median months | Within range | Below, gov. | Below, other | Above |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2018 | 308 | 83% | 24 | 37% | 30% | 31% | — |
| FY2019 | 308 | 81% | 27 | 41% | 30% | 29% | — |
| FY2020 | 245 | 74% | 24 | 35% | 33% | 31% | — |
| FY2021 | 219 | 74% | 18 | 27% | 35% | 36% | — |
| FY2022 | 248 | 82% | 18 | 25% | 39% | 33% | — |
| FY2023 | 212 | 76% | 21 | 39% | 22% | 35% | — |
| FY2024 | 196 | 84% | 24 | 35% | 26% | 35% | — |
| FY2025 | 181 | 84% | 24 | 41% | 13% | 42% | — |
§ 6Criminal history
Share of cases at each final criminal history category; grey figure: fraud, theft and embezzlement offences nationally.
§ 7Guidelines applied
- §2B1.1 Larceny, embezzlement, theft, fraud and deceit · 1,802 cases in the district (all offence types)
- §none · 460 cases in the district (all offence types)
- §2B1.4 Insider trading · <10 cases in the district (all offence types)
- §2X3.1 Accessory after the fact · <10 cases in the district (all offence types)
- §2F1.1 Fraud and deceit (pre-2001 guideline) · <10 cases in the district (all offence types)
- §2X1.1 Attempt, solicitation or conspiracy (not covered by a specific guideline) · <10 cases in the district (all offence types)
Primary guidelines the Commission associates with this offence type, with the district's caseload under each across all offence types.
§ 8Questions and answers
What is the typical sentence for fraud, theft and embezzlement offences in the Central District of California?
The median prison term over FY2018–FY2025 was 24 months (2 years), with the middle half of terms between 9 and 41 months. 80% of cases carried a prison term. The national median for fraud, theft and embezzlement offences is 20 months.
How often are fraud, theft and embezzlement offences sentenced below the guideline range here?
29% of sentences were below the range on a government motion and 34% below it for other reasons; 35% were within the range. The Commission's categories are explained in the guide to how the guidelines work.
How does this compare with the rest of the country?
Nationally, fraud, theft and embezzlement offences had a median prison term of 20 months and a within-range share of 44% over the same period. The district's figures are above on median term and lower than the national within-range share.
Which guidelines are involved?
The most common primary guidelines for these cases are §2B1.1, §none and §2B1.4.
Is this a prediction for a particular case?
No. The figures are aggregates of sentences already imposed, as recorded by the US Sentencing Commission. They are not legal advice and do not estimate the outcome of any case.
§ 9Other offence types in the Central District of California
- Drug Trafficking 2,554
- Firearms 803
- Immigration 777
- Money Launder 281
- Robbery 270
- Child Pornography 178
- Bribery/Corruption 149
- Tax 141
- Other 137
- Sex Abuse 101
- Assault 93
- Extortion/Racketeering 73
§ 10Provenance
Source: United States Sentencing Commission, Individual Offender Datafiles, fiscal years 2018–2025 (US government works), aggregated by this site; the FY2025 file is dated 29 Apr 2026. Offence type is the Commission's OFFGUIDE code 16; district is CIRCDIST 65. Counts below 10 are hidden or pooled. Errors in this site's processing are corrected at the next build; see corrections. Methodology.